Editorial Standards

New Hampshire Review is committed to producing accurate, fair, and transparent journalism. These standards govern the work of every member of our editorial team and are enforced by our editorial leadership.

Commitment to Accuracy

Accuracy is the foundation of our credibility. Every article published by New Hampshire Review must meet the following standards:

• All claims of fact must be supported by a minimum of two independent sources.
• Data, statistics, and public records must be verified against primary sources — including government filings, official releases, and recognized data providers — before publication.
• Quotations must be accurate and presented in their proper context.
• Headlines and social media summaries must accurately reflect the content of the article.

Fact-Checking Process

All articles undergo editorial review prior to publication. Our fact-checking process includes verification of key claims, review of source quality, and confirmation that statistical data is current and accurately represented. For sensitive or high-impact stories, additional review may be conducted by senior editorial staff.

Sourcing Standards

New Hampshire Review relies on credible, identifiable sources whenever possible. Our sourcing standards include:

• On-the-record, named sources are preferred in all reporting.
• Anonymous sources are used only when the information is of significant public interest and cannot be obtained through on-the-record means. When anonymous sources are used, editors must know the identity and motivation of the source.
• We clearly distinguish between confirmed facts, analysis, and opinion.
• Wire service and third-party reporting is attributed when used.

Corrections Policy

When errors are identified in published content, we correct them promptly and transparently:

• Corrections are appended to the article with a clear correction notice stating what was changed and when the correction was made.
• Minor fixes (typos, formatting) may be made without a formal correction notice.
• Substantive errors — including factual inaccuracies, misattributions, or misleading claims — receive a prominently displayed correction at the top of the article.
• We do not delete published content to conceal errors. The original context is preserved alongside the correction.

To report an error, contact us at editors@newhampshirereview.com.

Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions at New Hampshire Review are made independently of advertisers, sponsors, and commercial interests. Our policies ensure:

• Advertisers and sponsors have no influence over editorial content, story selection, or coverage decisions.
• Sponsored content and paid placements are clearly labeled and visually distinguished from editorial content.
• Editorial staff do not participate in advertising sales or revenue negotiations.

Conflicts of Interest

New Hampshire Review requires disclosure of potential conflicts of interest:

• Authors who hold financial positions in companies discussed in their reporting must disclose those positions within the article.
• Editorial staff must disclose any personal, financial, or professional relationships that could reasonably be perceived as influencing their coverage.
• New Hampshire Review does not accept compensation from the subjects of our reporting in exchange for coverage.

AI-Assisted Content

New Hampshire Review uses artificial intelligence tools as part of its research and editorial process. Our AI policy is transparent:

• AI tools may be used to assist with research, data analysis, drafting, and content optimization.
• All content is reviewed, verified, and approved by human editors before publication.
• AI-generated analysis or summaries are checked against primary sources.
• The use of AI tools does not diminish our commitment to accuracy, sourcing standards, or editorial judgment.

These standards are reviewed and updated periodically by our editorial leadership. Questions about our editorial practices may be directed to editors@newhampshirereview.com.